1982年创刊| ISSN 1008-3847| CN 44-1202/S
稿件系统登录

本期杂志

办刊方针

面向生产,而向基层,面向农村;
以普及为主,兼顾提高;
以实用为主,兼顾基础理论;
立足广东,流通全国,走向世界。
养禽与禽病防治 2026年4期 - 16 -

基于低深度重测序的多世代联合基因组预测在鸡产蛋性状上的应用效果

刘晓琪 ( 华南农业大学动物科学学院;华南农业大学动物科学学院 , 广东 , 广州 510642 )
叶浩强 ( 华南农业大学动物科学学院;华南农业大学动物科学学院 , 广东 , 广州 510642 )
李恒丰 ( 佛山市南海种禽有限公司, , 广东 , 佛山 528225 )
蔡柏林 ( 华南农业大学动物科学学院;华南农业大学动物科学学院 , 广东 , 广州 510642 )
郑煦灿 ( 佛山市南海种禽有限公司, , 广东 , 佛山 528225 )
聂庆华 ( 华南农业大学动物科学学院;华南农业大学动物科学学院 , 广东 , 广州 510642 )
中图分类号:S831.2 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1008-3847(2026)04-0016-08
资助项目:国家重点研发计划重点专项(2021YFD1300100);广东省农业农村厅种业振兴项目(2024-XPY-07-001)。
摘要: 在鸡的基因组选择中,受限于成本,分型个体少,且单一群体构建的参考群样本量比较有限,
影响了基因组预测的准确度。低深度基因组重测序可以捕获全基因组变异,应用于基因组选择时,相较于
高深度测序,能在降低分型成本的同时保持较好的预测性能。合并多个群体进行联合基因组预测可以快速
扩大参考群规模以提升预测精度。本研究以佛山市南海种禽有限公司某黄羽肉鸡专门化品系核心育种群为
研究对象,利用该群体第 20 世代(G20)和第 21 世代(G21)共 1 910 个个体的低深度全基因组重测序
数据与产蛋表型,通过 10 折 10 次重复交叉验证计算预测准确性,系统评估不同参考群与模型组合的基
因组选择效果。在单世代参考群中,采用单性状模型(ST-PBLUP、ST-GBLUP 和 ST-ssGBLUP)进行
预测 ;在两世代合并参考群中,同时采用单性状模型(ST-PBLUP、ST-GBLUP 和 ST-ssGBLUP)与多
性状模型(MT-PBLUP、MT-GBLUP 和 MT-ssGBLUP)开展预测,以探究联合基因组预测在鸡基因组
选择中的应用价值。 发现 :单世代群体和合并世代群体的基因组预测相较常规 PBLUP 方法均具有更高的
预测精度,且 ssGBLUP 的预测性能最好 ;联合基因组预测的效果优于单一参考群预测 ;与单一参考群预
测相比, ST-ssGBLUP 方法对 5 个产蛋性状的预测准确性提高了 4.57% ~ 25.21%,对于 MT-ssGBLUP 方法,
300 日龄产蛋数、正常蛋数 2 个性状在 2 个世代群体间的遗传相关极高(0.995),预测准确性分别提高了
14.31% 和 23.41%。结果表明,在鸡的遗传育种上,相较于传统方法,基因组选择可以显著提高预测准确性;
多世代联合基因组预测较单一参考群预测能获得更好的预测效果。
关键字: 产蛋性状 低深度全基因组重测序 联合基因组预测 多性状模型
参考文献
[1] Zhang Z, Xu Z Q, Luo Y Y, et al. Whole genomic
prediction of growth and carcass traits in a Chinese
quality chicken population[J]. Journal of Animal
Science, 2017, 95(1): 72-80.
[2] Zhang Y, Zhuang Z, Liu Y, et al. Genomic prediction
based on preselected single-nucleotide polymorphisms from
genome-wide association study and imputed whole-genome
sequence data annotation for growth traits in duroc pigs[J].
Evolutionary Applications, 2024, 17(2): e13651.
[3] Pedrosa V B, Chen S Y, Gloria L S, et al. Machine
learning methods for genomic prediction of cow
behavioral traits measured by automatic milking
systems in north American holstein cattle[J]. Journal
of Dairy Science, 2024, 107(7): 4758-4771.
[4] 王元清 , 王泽昭 , 朱波 , 等 . 不同芯片密度对华西
牛重要经济性状基因组评估准确性的影响 [J]. 畜牧
兽医学报 , 2025, 56(2): 591-602.
[5] 王雪 , 司敬方 , 张毅 . 奶牛基因组预测方法的研
究进展 [J]. 中国畜牧杂志 , 2024, 60(11): 21-27.
[6] Van Den Berg I, Meuwissen T H E, MacLeod I M, et al.
Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy
of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction[J].
Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(4): 3155-3174.
[7] Teng J Yan, Ye S Pan, Gao N, et al. Incorporating
genomic annotation into single-step genomic prediction
with imputed whole-genome sequence data[J]. Journal
of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 1126-1136.
[8] Zhao C, Teng J, Zhang X, et al. Towards a cost￾effective implementation of genomic prediction based
on low coverage whole genome sequencing in dezhou
donkey[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2021, 12: 728764.
[9] Yin C, Zhou P, Wang Y, et al. Using genomic selection
to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi￾populations in pigs[J]. Animals, 2024, 18(2): 101062.
[10] Ye H, Ji C, Liu X, et al. Improvement of the accuracy
of breeding value prediction for egg production traits
in Muscovy duck using low-coverage whole-genome
sequence data[J]. Poultry Science, 2025, 104(2): 104812.
[11] Zhou L, Zhu L, Ma F, et al. Assessing the impact
of different mixing strategies on genomic prediction
accuracy for beef cattle breeding values in multi-breed
genomic prediction[J]. Animals, 2025, 15(16): 2463.
[12] Wang X, Zhang Z, Du H, et al. Predictive ability
of multi-population genomic prediction methods of
phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and austrian
pigs[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2024, 56(1): 49.
[13] 郑扬勋 , 李涛 , 祁鑫 , 等 . 基于芯片和低深度测
序的大白猪繁殖性状多群体基因组选择研究 [J]. 中
国畜牧杂志 , 2025, 61(8): 85-90.
[14] Zhang T, Gao L, Zhou B, et al. Genomic selection
for early growth traits in inner mongolian cashmere
goats using ABLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP methods.
[J]. Animals, 2025, 15(12): 1733.
[15] Afrazandeh M, Abdolahi-Arpanahi R, Abbasi M
A, et al. Comparison of different response variables
in genomic prediction using GBLUP and ssGBLUP
23 2026 年第 4 期
methods in iranian holstein cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy
Research, 2022, 89(2): 121-127.
[16] De Hollander C A, Chu T T, Marois D, et al. The
effect of preselection on the level of bias and accuracy in a
broiler breeder population, a simulation study[J]. Journal of
Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2025, 142(4): 392-407.
[17] Ajasa A A, Boison S A, Gjøen H M, et al. Accuracy
of genomic prediction using multiple atlantic salmon
populations[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2024, 56(1): 38.
[18] Wang Z, Ma H, Li H, et al. Multi-trait genomic
predictions using GBLUP and Bayesian mixture prior
model in beef cattle[J]. Animal Research and One
Health, 2023, 1(1): 17-29.
[19] Wang X, Zhang Z, Du H, et al. Predictive ability
of multi-population genomic prediction methods of
phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian
pigs[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2024, 56(1): 49.
[20] 张锡飞 . 基于多性状一步法的杜洛克猪基因组选
择应用效果的比较研究 [D]. 雅安 : 四川农业大学 , 2025.
[21] Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, et al. fastp: An ultrafast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor[J]. Bioinformatics,
2018, 34(17): i884-i890.
[22] Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read
alignment with burrows-wheeler transform.[J].
Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(14): 1754-1760.
[23] Rhie A, McCarthy S A, Fedrigo O, et al. Towards
complete and error-free genome assemblies of all
vertebrate species[J]. Nature, 2021, 592(7856): 737-746.
[24] Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The
sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools.[J].
Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(16): 2078-2079.
[25] Liu S, Huang S, Chen F, et al. Genomic Analyses
from Non-invasive Prenatal Testing Reveal Genetic
Associations, Patterns of Viral Infections, and Chinese
Population History[J]. Cell, 2018, 175(2): 347-359.e14.
[26] Davies R W, Kucka M, Su D, et al. Rapid genotype
imputation from sequence with reference panels[J].
Nature Genetics, 2021, 53(7): 1104-1111.
[27] Browning B L, Browning S R. Genotype Imputation
with Millions of Reference Samples[J]. The American
Journal of Human Genetics, 2016, 98(1): 116-126.
[28] Chang C C, Chow C C, Tellier L C, et al. Secondgeneration PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger
and richer datasets.[J]. Gigascience, 2015, 4(1): s13742-
015-0047-0048.
[29] VanRaden P M. Efficient methods to compute
genomic predictions[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008,
91(11): 4414-4423.
[30] 刘勃攻 , 杨杰 , 肖健 , 等 . 利用 BLUP 和 Bayes
方法对湘佳黑凤鸡 S1 系产蛋性状基因组育种值预
测效果的比较研究 [J]. 中国家禽 , 2025, 47(1): 1-7.
[31] 张德祥 , 徐振强 , 张燕 . 优质黄鸡矮小型母系
繁殖性能的遗传参数估计 [J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医 ,
2016(23): 85-87.
[32] Huang X, Zhong Z, Zhang Z, et al. Genome-wide
association study reveals candidate genes associated
with egg-laying performance in wuhua yellow
chicken[J]. Poultry Science, 2025, 104(11): 105739.
[33] Yang J, Calus M P L, Wientjes Y C J, et al.
Incorporating information of causal variants in
genomic prediction using GBLUP or machine learning
models in a simulated livestock population[J]. Journal
of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2025, 16(1): 118.
[34] Judge M M, Purfield D C, Sleator R D, et al. The impact
of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on
imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions1[J].
Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 95(4): 1489-1501.
[35] Speed D, Hemani G, Johnson M R, et al. Improved
heritability estimation from genome-wide SNPs.[J]. The
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2012, 91(6): 1011-1021.
[36] Song H, Zhang J, Zhang Q, et al. Using different
single-step strategies to improve the efficiency of
genomic prediction on body measurement traits in pig.
[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2019, 9: 730.
[37] Teng J, Zhai T, Zhang X, et al. Improving multipopulation genomic prediction accuracy using multitrait GBLUP models which incorporate global or
local genetic correlation information[J]. Briefings in
Bioinformatics, 2024, 25(4): bbae276.
[38] Tang X, Xiao S, Ding N, et al. Comparative study
of single-trait and multi-trait genomic prediction
models[J]. Animals, 2024, 14(20): 2961.
[39] Teng J, Zhai T, Zhang X, et al. Improving multitrait genomic prediction by incorporating local genetic
correlations[J]. Communications Biology, 2025, 8(1): 307.
责任编辑: 王守志